- Details
- By Jenna Kunze
**This story contains disturbing details from U.S. Indian Boarding Schools. For support and mental health resources, visit The Native American Boarding School Healing Coalition’s list of resources.**
Harvard’s Peabody Museum is reversing course on its claims that federal repatriation laws don’t apply to its collection of hair clippings taken from the heads of Native American children attending U.S. Indian Boarding Schools.
Make A Donation Here
The museum, which announced the previously undocumented collection in early November, wrote in a listserv email chain last week it had been informed by the Department of Interior on Dec. 1 that the so-called “Woodbury Collection” is subject to the federal Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).
“The museum is currently working with the Department of the Interior’s National NAGPRA Program on implementation of the NAGPRA process with respect to the Woodbury Collection. Returns will take place through NAGPRA to lineal descendants and/or Tribal Nations,” the email reads. “In early January 2023, the museum will send letters to Tribal Nations with more information on repatriating hair under NAGPRA to Indian Tribes and any known lineal descendants.”
On Nov. 10, the Peabody Museum announced online that it discovered a collection of 1,500 hair samples taken from people across Asia, Central America, North America, Oceania, and South America. Included among them were clippings of hair from approximately 700 Native American children attending U.S. Indian Boarding Schools, assembled by anthropologist and former Harvard professor George Woodbury between 1930 and 1933.
About 300 tribal nations had samples taken from their kids from at least 21 boarding school locations, plus an additional 12 “collecting locations” according to documentation attached to many of the samples. The most samples, records show, were taken from 138 children at The Fort Totten Indian School in North Dakota, and 122 children at the Sherman Institute in Riverside, California.
Included in its published information about the collection, the museum apologized for its “complicity in the objectification of Native peoples and for our more than 80-year possession of hair taken from their relatives” and promised to work with tribal nations to return their respective ancestors’ hair samples.
But Native leaders at the forefront of Indigenous repatriation work said that Harvard’s announcement sidestepped one glaring detail: legal responsibility.
Under NAGPRA, which has been law since the 1990s, the museum is required to catalog and return their collections of Native American human remains and their burial objects. Human remains are defined by law as “The physical remains of the body of a person of Native American ancestry.”
Harvard University spokesperson Rachael Dane last month told Native News Online that when the Peabody began organizing its collections in a database in 2008, the location of the Woodbury collection was marked “unknown.” In April 2022, Peabody Museum staff cataloged the Woodbury Collection and determined its contents.
A failure to report human remains under NAGPRA is subject to a penalty of $7,475 for each lineal descendant involved. In this case, if Harvard were found to be out of compliance with NAGPRA for its collection of inventoried 700 hair samples, it would owe more than $5 million, National NAGPRA Program manager Melanie O’Brien told Native News Online last month.
In November, Peabody spokesperson Dane told Native News Online that the hair samples held by the museum aren’t subject to NAGPRA.
“The Peabody Museum understands that this type of hair sample, which can be found in many museums and federal agencies, is not subject to NAGPRA,” Dane wrote.
Communication and direction from the Department of the Interior appears to contradict that claim.
The Peabody has since updated its website to include a tab on NAGPRA information and return.
O’Brien confirmed to Native News Online that she is working directly with the Peabody staff on how to proceed under NAGPRA.
In the meantime, the Association on American Indian Affairs (AAIA), which organizes an annual conference on Native American repatriation, called Harvard’s most recent announcement more of the “same old.”
“What we have been telling Harvard and what we continue to say is that they are not asking tribes before they act,” AAIA CEO and Attorney Shannon O’Loughlin (Choctaw) told Native News Online.
The day before the Peabody went public with news of the Woodbury collection, Dane said museum staff sent emails to tribal historic presentation officers with public emails listed online. The following day—before hearing back from each tribe—the museum published its online statement, including a list of affiliated tribes.
“They're not seeking support outside of their own echo chamber to know how to properly handle these things,” O’Loughlin said. “It's difficult to move them out of their own echo chamber, so I'm glad they're at least listening to the National NAGPRA Program.”
More Stories Like This
'This is all we have.' | Tribal Citizens Continue Protest of Wind River Land GrabOsage Minerals Council Secures Landmark Legal Victory Over Enel for Trespass in Osage Mineral Estate
David Sickey Writes About the Historic Opportunity for Tribes to Secure Their Water Rights
Keepers of the Flame Storytellers Charged with Sustaining Chickasaw Essence
Land Back: United Houma Nation Received Sacred Indian Mounds Back
Can we take a minute to talk about tribal sovereignty?
Sovereignty isn't just a concept – it's the foundation of Native nations' right to govern, protect our lands, and preserve our cultures. Every story we publish strengthens tribal sovereignty.
Unlike mainstream media, we center Indigenous voices and report directly from Native communities. When we cover land rights, water protection, or tribal governance, we're not just sharing news – we're documenting our living history and defending our future.
Our journalism is powered by readers, not shareholders. If you believe in the importance of Native-led media in protecting tribal sovereignty, consider supporting our work today.
Right now, your support goes twice as far. Thanks to a generous $35,000 matching fund, every dollar you give during December 2024 will be doubled to protect sovereignty and amplify Native voices.
No paywalls. No corporate owners. Just independent, Indigenous journalism.
