- By Elyse Wild
BISMARCK, ND — North Dakota lawmakers introduced a bill on Monday that would solidify the rules of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) into state law.
Representative Jayme Davis, D-Rolette, an enrolled member of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa, is sponsoring House Bill 1536.
The bipartisan proposal comes as Indian Country awaits the Supreme Court decision on Haaland vs. Brackeen, which will determine the fate of the 43-year-old federal law designed to keep children who are tribal members with Native families. The court heard arguments in November 2022 and is expected to release a ruling later this year. Advocates in Indian Country consider the case to be the most significant threat to sovereignty in modern times.
Davis introduced the bill to North Dakota’s House Human Services Committee on Monday, telling the committee that the law would ensure that Native children grow up with their cultural ties intact. In answering questions from the committee, she distinguished Native Americans as political entities in the eyes of the law, as opposed to a racial group.
“The Supreme Court decision could come down at any time,” Davis said. “It’s important that the state codifies our own ICWA.”
ICWA came in response to centuries of Indian Country being decimated by the forced separation of children and families. Native children were often placed in residential boarding schools and subject to horrific and sometimes deadly abuse.
Congress enacted ICWA less than a decade after the Association on American Indian Affairs found that 25 percent to 35 percent of all Native children had been removed from their families and placed in foster homes, nine out of 10 times with non-Native parents.
Scott Davis (Standing Rock Sioux Tribe), former executive director of the North Dakota Indian Affairs Commission, testified before Monday’s committee in support of the bill. Davis noted that collaboration between states and tribes is essential to protecting sovereignty.
“This bill is another example of how we — states and tribes — have to band together when it comes to federal overreach,” David said. “We’ve seen federal agencies create a once size fits all approach that doesn’t work for states or tribes.”
It’s important for us to keep ICWA law strong and keep this relationship between the states and tribes strong ... this is very, very important to my people, my relatives, our court systems, and our sovereignty.”
All five federally recognized tribes in North Dakota tribes were consulted in drafting the bill.
Eleven states have a version of ICWA codified into law, including Iowa, Michigan and Nebraska.
No one testified against the bill Monday. The panel is not expected to vote on the bill before next week.
More Stories Like ThisColorado Hospital Finally Admits to Cutting Lakota Elder’s Hair Without His Permission
Large Majority of Mainers Support Making Clearer State’s Treaty Obligations to Wabanaki
NCAI Faces Controversial Constitutional Amendments to Remove State Recognized Tribes
Hospitalized Lakota Elder's Waist-length Hair Cut without His Permission; Family & AIM Demand Answers
9th Annual Repatriation Conference: "Building the Next Fire"
Together, we can educate, enlighten, and empower.November is celebrated as “Native American Heritage Month.” At Native News Online, we amplify Native voices and share our relatives’ unique perspectives every day of the year. We believe every month should celebrate Native American heritage.
If you appreciate our commitment to Native voices and our mission to tell stories that connect us to our roots and inspire understanding and respect, we hope you will consider making a donation this month to support our work. For those who commit to a recurring donation of $12 per month or more, or make a one-time donation of $150 or greater, we're excited to offer you a copy of our upcoming Indian Boarding School publication and access to our quarterly Founder’s Circle meetings and newsletter.