- Details
- By Neely Bardwell
Native Vote 2024. New research from the University of Utah’s College of Social & Behavioral Science assessing the benefits and alleged costs of ballot collection on Indian reservations debunks common misconceptions about ballot collection.
Native American communities often rely on common misconceptions due to socioeconomic and logistical challenges.
The research, focusing on Indian reservations in Montana and other Western states, appears in the July edition of the “American Indian Culture and Research Journal.” Authors Daniel McCool, a professor emeritus in the Department of Political Science, and Weston McCool, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Anthropology, are a father-son duo.
Ballot collection, sometimes negatively referred to by critics as “ballot harvesting,” is the practice of someone other than the voter turning in completed ballots to a post office or ballot box. With the rising popularity of mail-in voting, ballot collection is becoming increasingly popular.
By examining trends in vote-by-mail programs, socioeconomic variables, distance to polling stations and mail locations, and U.S. Postal Service delivery efficiency on reservations, the McCool team documented how ballot collection improves the voting experience of Natives.
In an attempt to help Native Americans who often lack home mail service, nonprofits such as Western Native Voice have collectors deliver tribal members’ ballots to a post office or polling station that are often miles from their homes. These ballot collectors are supervised by tribal governments and other nonprofits.
“They collected hundreds of ballots from Native Americans who live in very, very remote places,” Daniel McCool said originally to At the U. “The reason why these native voters were taking advantage of the ballot collection service was because it’s very difficult for them to overcome those long distances and the poor transportation.”
On reservations, where access to polling places and reliable mail services can be limited, ballot collection ensures community members can exercise their right to vote without undue burden.
Due to fear of fraud, legislatures in Utah and three other Western states have tried to ban the practice. Utah banned ballot collection by third parties under an election reform law unanimously passed in 2020. Nineteen states allowed only the voter, a family member or a caregiver to turn in a ballot during the study’s time frame. Four of these states, Arizona, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Nevada, have substantial Native American populations.
The statistical analysis conducted found no evidence to support allegations that ballot collection leads to voter fraud. The McCools used data collected by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank behind Project 2025.
“The evidence is actually collected by the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation,” McCool said. “We use their data to indicate that there’s no voter fraud associated with ballot collection.
The Heritage Foundation’s database documents 1,850 cases of proven voter fraud, which resulted in convictions, going back to 1980 for all elections surveyed. Using that data, the McCool team found that the frequency of voter fraud is .00006%. That is six cases of proven fraud for every 10 million votes cast in the United States
“The problem is not voter fraud,” McCool said. “The problem is the fraud about voter fraud.”
More Stories Like This
Native News Weekly (August 25, 2024): D.C. BriefsUS Presidents in Their Own Words Concerning American Indians
Native News Weekly (August 4, 2024): D.C. Briefs
Native News Weekly (June 15, 2025): D.C. Briefs
Photographs of the Homecoming of the Three Fires Powwow
Help us tell the stories that could save Native languages and food traditions
At a critical moment for Indian Country, Native News Online is embarking on our most ambitious reporting project yet: "Cultivating Culture," a three-year investigation into two forces shaping Native community survival—food sovereignty and language revitalization.
The devastating impact of COVID-19 accelerated the loss of Native elders and with them, irreplaceable cultural knowledge. Yet across tribal communities, innovative leaders are fighting back, reclaiming traditional food systems and breathing new life into Native languages. These aren't just cultural preservation efforts—they're powerful pathways to community health, healing, and resilience.
Our dedicated reporting team will spend three years documenting these stories through on-the-ground reporting in 18 tribal communities, producing over 200 in-depth stories, 18 podcast episodes, and multimedia content that amplifies Indigenous voices. We'll show policymakers, funders, and allies how cultural restoration directly impacts physical and mental wellness while celebrating successful models of sovereignty and self-determination.
This isn't corporate media parachuting into Indian Country for a quick story. This is sustained, relationship-based journalism by Native reporters who understand these communities. It's "Warrior Journalism"—fearless reporting that serves the 5.5 million readers who depend on us for news that mainstream media often ignores.
We need your help right now. While we've secured partial funding, we're still $450,000 short of our three-year budget. Our immediate goal is $25,000 this month to keep this critical work moving forward—funding reporter salaries, travel to remote communities, photography, and the deep reporting these stories deserve.
Every dollar directly supports Indigenous journalists telling Indigenous stories. Whether it's $5 or $50, your contribution ensures these vital narratives of resilience, innovation, and hope don't disappear into silence.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Native languages are being lost at an alarming rate. Food insecurity plagues many tribal communities. But solutions are emerging, and these stories need to be told.
Support independent Native journalism. Fund the stories that matter.
Levi Rickert (Potawatomi), Editor & Publisher
