- By Native News Online Staff
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — An study released Monday by three leading universities suggests the Trump administration miscalculated in its distribution of $4.8 billion to tribes under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act.
The study shows that the Department of Treasury used “arbitrary and capricious” data that either overrepresented or underrepresented the tribes’ populations, according to a group of researchers from Harvard, the University of Arizona and UCLA.
The formula Treasury used was borrowed from the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s formula used to distribute Indian Housing Block Grant funds.
The problem with using HUD’s formula is several tribes do not participate in the federal housing program. In the case of the tribes that don’t access HUD funds, they were noted as having zero population.
Key takeaways from the team’s analysis include:
- Different tribal population data series are available, and different series give rise to very different allocations of CARES Act dollars.
- The HUD data series Treasury has chosen purportedly measures, for each reservation, the number of residents who report their race as solely American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) or AI/AN in combination with one or more other races.
- The data used by the Treasury reports a number of tribes as having no population (e.g., because they do not participate in HUD’s IHBG housing program) and the chosen series is materially inconsistent with both US Census Department data and tribes’ own data.
- The CARES Act dollars are specifically earmarked for tribal governments. Thus, the case is strong that the Treasury should have used data on each tribe’s population of enrolled tribal citizens. These counts were requested by Treasury and submitted by tribes in mid-April but were not subsequently used by the Department to allocate the CARES Act funds. The resulting allocations demonstrably leave some tribes as “over-represented” and some tribes as “under-represented.”
During a Coronavirus Relief Fund forum held by the Treasury Department with the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) and the Native American Finance Officers Association, several tribal leaders voiced discontent with the formula used by the Treasury Department and asked the Treasury Department to fix the problem for when further funds are distributed.
To read the complete study, click here.
More Stories Like ThisNative News Weekly (January 23, 2022): D.C. Briefs
NCAI's 2022 Executive Council Winter Session to be Virtual Again This Year
US Supreme Court Will Not Consider Overturning McGirt Decision; Will Rule on Scope of the Landmark Ruling
Former Gov. Bill Richardson Promotes High-tech Jobs at Navajo Technical University; Donates 200 pairs of Nike Shoes to Crownpoint Students
Navajo Nation to Utilize Drones to Deliver Critical Supplies to Community
The truth about Indian Boarding Schools
This month, we’re asking our readers to help us raise $10,000 to fund our year-long journalism initiative called “The Indian Boarding School Project: A Dark Chapter in History.” Our mission is to shine a light on the dark era of forced assimilation of native American children by the U.S. government and churches. You’ll be able to read stories each week and join us for Livestream events to understand what the Indian Boarding School era has meant to Native Americans — and what it still means today.
This news will be provided free for everyone to read, but it is not free to produce. That’s why we’re asking you to make a donation this month to help support our efforts. Any contribution of any amount — big or small — gives us a better, stronger future and allows us to remain a force for change. Donate to Native News Online today and support independent Indigenous journalism. Thank you.