- Details
- By Neely Bardwell
The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU Law on Monday released a 16-page study, enittled“Voting on Tribal Lands: Barriers to Native American Turnout,” on Monday. The study found found that between 2012 and 2022, voter participation in federal elections for people living on tribal lands was on average 11 percentage points lower than those living off tribal lands in the same states.
Chelsea Jones and Coryn Grange, the study’s authors, write: “For far too long, Native Americans have faced barriers to voting that impede their full political participation. While de jure disenfranchisement of Native Americans no longer exists, de facto disenfranchisement continues to flourish, as is evident in the turnout gap between voters on and off tribal lands.”
Research for this study was conducted prior to this year's election, therefore the study does not include data on how Native Americans voted in the 2024 presidential election.
The study looked at voter turnout among people living on tribal lands, specifically in 21 states that have more than 5,000 people living on federally recognized tribal lands with more than 20 percent of that tribal land population identifying as Native American. The voter turnout of those who reside on tribal lands was compared to the voter turnout of those who don't.
“In 2020, for example, had the nearly 900,000 voters on the tribal lands we studied turned out at the same rate as others in their states, roughly 160,000 more votes would have been cast. In addition, turnout was lower on tribal lands with higher shares of Native American adults. Voters on tribal lands were also 7 percentage points less likely than those not on tribal lands to vote by mail or vote early. The U.S. government’s persistent inaction to improve voting conditions for Native Americans has resulted in widespread disenfranchisement and furthered a legacy of mistrust in the political system.”
The states included in the study were Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
It is widely known that Native voter turnout consistently lags that of other groups. This is due to various issues and barriers to mail, early voting, polling places, and even registration to vote on tribal lands. Using millions of voter records from 2012 to 2022, Jones and Grange found that voter turnout during that period was substantially lower for people living on tribal lands, particularly those where Native Americans are concentrated.
Of the tribal lands studied, 53 percent of the population in 2020 identified as Native American.
The authors recognize that accurately surveying Indian Country is difficult. There are nearly 1.3 million American Indian or Alaska Native people living on federally recognized tribal lands in the United States. The voter records used for the study are “snapshots” of the greater AI/AN populations. The “tribal lands” data is from the U.S. Census–designated, federally recognized American Indian Reservations.
“The geographic isolation of rural tribal lands is one of the largest obstacles to voting. Election offices are typically located outside of tribal lands; for instance, on the Pyramid-Lake Reservation in Nevada and the portion of the Navajo Nation in Utah, these offices are more than 100 miles away. Some reservation residents, like members of the Karuk Tribe in California, must drive across dangerous terrain to access their county seats for election services.”
More Stories Like This
Native News Weekly (August 25, 2024): D.C. BriefsNative News Weekly (August 4, 2024): D.C. Briefs
Whtie House Tribal Nations Summit Set for Dec. 9
'More Than Just Food' | Tocabe Indigenous Marketplace Offers Native Ingredients, Meal Kits for Every Table
Support Independent Indigenous Journalism That Holds Power to Account
With the election now decided, Native News Online is recommitting to our core mission: rigorous oversight of federal Indian policy and its impact on tribal communities.
The previous Trump administration’s record on Indian Country — from the reduction of sacred sites to aggressive energy development on tribal lands — demands heightened vigilance as we enter this new term. Our Indigenous-centered newsroom will provide unflinching coverage of policies affecting tribal sovereignty, sacred site protection, MMIR issues, water rights, Indian health, and economic sovereignty.
This critical watchdog journalism requires resources. Your support, in any amount, helps maintain our independent, Native-serving news coverage. Every contribution helps keep our news free for all of our relatives. Please donate today to ensure Native News Online can thrive and deliver impactful, independent journalism.
