fbpx
 

On Friday, June 24, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that a copper mine in Arizona can proceed with operations while a lawsuit filed by Apache Stronghold is pending. Resolution Copper, a joint venture between Rio Tinto and BHP—both mining companies from Australia—plans to develop one of the largest undeveloped copper deposits in the world near a site that some Apache believe is sacred. 

 The copper deposit is located within the Tonto National Forest and its transfer was authorized by an act of Congress, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2014. The bill required the government to exchange the land and allow the mine to be built. 

In its lawsuit against the U.S., Apache Stronghold, a nonprofit organization, argued that the 2,422 acres of land the U.S. government exchanged to Resolution Copper includes a ceremonial ground called Chichʼil Bildagoteel, known as “Oak Flat.” 

The federal court ruled that the land exchange would not violate Tribal members’ religious freedom protections under the U.S. Constitution or the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993 religious liberty law, as Apache Stronghold’s lawsuit contends. 

Never miss Indian Country’s biggest stories and breaking news. Sign up to get our reporting sent straight to your inbox every weekday morning.

“The Department of Agriculture will simply transfer ownership of a plot of government land to Resolution Copper, and the Land Exchange does not coerce the Apache to abandon their religion by threatening them with a negative outcome,” wrote Judge Carlos Bea in Friday’s decision. Chief Judge Mary Murguia agreed.

Mining was banned at Oak Flat until 2014, after the NDAA was passed, but the land exchange faced several hurdles over the years: It was nearly completed towards the end of the Trump administration, but was halted due to Apache Stronghold’s lawsuit, which is still pending. The Biden administration rescinded the approval for the land exchange, in hopes for more tribal consultation. 

Dr. Wendsler Nosie, Sr., former Tribal Chairman for the San Carlos Apache Tribe and a spokesperson for Apache Stronghold said in a statement that the organization will appeal the ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. “Oak Flat is like Mount Sinai to us, our most sacred site where we connect with our Creation, our faith, our families and our land.,” he said. 

Judge Marsha Berzon, who voted against the 2-1 majority, wrote that transferring the site to Resolution Copper would destroy Oak Flat and, therefore, eliminate the possibility of holding ceremonies there. The transfer would “make the site inaccessible and eventually destroy it, objectively preventing Apaches from holding religious ceremonies there,” she wrote. 

“As we reach this conclusion, we do not rejoice. Rather, we recognize the deep ties that the Apache have to Oak Flat and to the nearby Apache Leap and Devil’s Canyon,” wrote Bea on behalf of the court. “And we acknowledge that the Land Exchange may impact the Apache’s plans to worship on Oak Flat. But RFRA, the Free Exercise Clause, and the 1852 Treaty of Santa Fe do not afford Apache Stronghold the relief that it seeks. This dispute must be resolved as are most others in our pluralistic nation: through the political process.”

More Stories Like This

Tribal Lands and Environment Forum Convenes in Milwaukee
Indigenous Leaders Form a New Coalition Secure Indigenous People’s Rights in a Green Economy
Federal Grant Aims to Help the Oneida Nation Move Further Toward Renewable, Resilient Energy
Fond du Lac and Grand Portage Ojibwe Tribes File Suit Against EPA
Michigan Public Service Commision Demands Enbridge Explain their Plan for Line 5

Do you appreciate a Native perspective on the news? 

For the past decade-plus, we’ve covered the important Indigenous stories that are often overlooked by other media. From the protests at Standing Rock and the toppling of colonizer statues during the racial equity protests, to the ongoing epidemic of Murdered and Missing Indigenous Women (MMIW) and the past-due reckoning related to assimilation, cultural genocide and Indian Boarding Schools, we have been there to provide a Native perspective and elevate Native voices.

Our news is free for everyone to read, but it is not free to produce. That’s why we’re asking you to make a donation this month to help support our efforts. Any contribution — big or small — helps us remain a force for change in Indian Country and continue telling the stories that are so often ignored, erased or overlooked.  Most often, our donors make a one-time gift of $20 or more, while many choose to make a recurring monthly donation of $5 or $10.  Whatever you can do, it helps fund our Indigenous-led newsroom and our ability to cover Native news. 

Donate to Native News Online today and support independent Indigenous journalism. Thank you. 

About The Author
Author: Darren ThompsonEmail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Darren Thompson (Lac du Flambeau Ojibwe) is a freelance journalist and based in the Twin Cities of Minnesota, where he also contributes to Unicorn Riot, an alternative media publication. Thompson has reported on political unrest, tribal sovereignty, and Indigenous issues for the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network, Indian Country Today, Native News Online, Powwows.com and Unicorn Riot. He has contributed to the New York Times, the Washington Post, and Voice of America on various Indigenous issues in international conversation. He has a bachelor’s degree in Criminology & Law Studies from Marquette University in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.