fbpx
 

The U.S. Supreme Court announced Monday, February 28, that it will hear several cases challenging the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act, or ICWA. The law was passed in 1978 in response to the disproportionate removal of Native children from their homes, families and communities.

The Indian Child Welfare Act is a federal law that is used in Native child adoption cases.

This story was originally published by KNBA on Monday February 28, 2022. Read the original storyat KNBA. Republished by Native News Online with permission.

ICWA basically provides Tribes with an opportunity to intervene when state child welfare and adoption agencies consider whether to remove a Native child from a home. The children can be enrolled citizens of the Tribe or be eligible for membership status.

Want more Native News? Get the free daily newsletter today.

Some states passed their own ICWA laws, but those laws must offer additional benefits – not change or remove the application of federal law.

Many of the arguments opposing ICWA say that law illegally discriminates against non-Native families based on race when placing Native children in homes.

And that’s the argument at the core of Brackeen v. Haaland. The case began as a lawsuit in 2018 in Texas. It challenges ICWA as a race-based law and says it should be struck down based on equal-protection grounds.

In April, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals divided on Brackeen v. Haaland in a split decision and ruled that parts of ICWA were constitutional, while others were not.

Because of the split decision, the ruling applies only to the judicial district which includes Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas.

In September, four Tribes, the state of Texas and several parents filed petitions to ask the Supreme Court to review the decision.

The Supreme Court has consolidated all of those petitions but has not yet set a date to hear them.

Also Monday, the Supreme Court declined to hear arguments in a case between Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians versus Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians v. Whitmer).

The federally recognized Tribe, which includes more than 4,000 Tribal citizens, appealed a decision against them in which they argued the 1855 Treaties of Detroit established a federal reservation for the Tribe.

The Tribe filed its petition for the Supreme Court to hear the case in November.

Photo caption: The U.S. Supreme Court on November 20, 2020. (Creative Commons photo courtesy Miki Jourdan/Flickr)

More Stories Like This

Representation Matters: Tlingit Woman Joins NBC News as Contributor on Native issues
Native News Weekly (May 22, 2022): D.C. Briefs
WATCH:  Native Bidaske featuring Bryan Newland, the Interior Department’s assistant secretary of Indian Affairs
Georgia Republican Gubernatorial Primary Candidate Kandiss Taylor Makes Stupid, Crass Comment about Native Americans, the First Amendment, Georgia, and Jesus
Navajo Citizen Judge Sunshine Sykes Confirmed to Serve as U.S. District Court Judge

About The Author
Author: Tripp J Crouse - KNBAEmail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.