- Details
- By Jenna Kunze
The study, conducted in partnership with the USC Norman Lear Center’s Media Impact Project, analyzes the portrayal of 104 Native characters across 51 series that aired with new episodes between 2020 and 2022. Specifically, the study focused on three series: Rutherford Falls, Reservation Dogs, and Yellowstone.
Overall, the study found that about half of the Native characters represented in scripted TV were poor or working class, and less than 20% committed nonviolent crimes or an act of physical violence.
Additionally, researchers conducted a study surveying 1,200 viewers on the impact of each series on audiences’ knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors.
The study’s results highlight the contrasting impacts of two Native-led shows, Rutherford Falls and Reservation Dogs, against the non-Native-led Yellowstone. Viewers of the former two shows were significantly more likely to agree with policy that supports and centers Indigenous voices, such as the removal of Native American imagery from sports teams and the government’s duty to uphold treaty and trust responsibilities.
Additionally, Reservation Dogs viewers—a show that featured a storyline in season two about a Native teenager placed in a non-Native youth home—were more likely to support the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a policy aimed at keeping Native American children with Native American families, recently upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Viewers of Yellowstone were less likely to support the U.S. upholding treaty obligations that allow Native Americans to control their own lands, and more likely to feel discomfort with the idea that some practices, such as sacred ceremonies, are not meant to include everyone.
“Not only was viewing series with prominent Native characters associated with knowledge of and beliefs about Native communities, but also with support around very concrete present-day issues, such as ICWA or ending the use of Native appropriation in sports,” Soraya Giaccardi, Senior Researcher at USC Norman Lear Center’s Media Impact Project and lead author of the report said in a press release.
The study also found that involving Native talent both in front of and behind the camera is crucial to a series’ success. Of the 51 series analyzed, two-thirds had no Native talent behind the scenes, yet those that did received better audience reception.
Also, series featuring larger Native ensembles garnered greater critical acclaim, according to the study. While the report paints a mostly positive picture of current on-screen Native representation, researchers caution that this progress could be at risk if the current surge in Native storytelling ends.
Many of the series examined have since concluded, with only four confirmed renewals including Native talent behind the scenes.
In conclusion, the study says that “there is significant room for improvement in representation of Native talent behind the scenes.” Despite an average of 10 Native characters per series, only one in three had any Native writers, directors, or executive producers.
“This analysis reaffirms our long-held belief that when non-Native people tell our stories – even those that may be well-intentioned – there’s a high risk that these stories will ultimately diminish Native autonomy or further stereotypes of our communities,” said Crystal Echo Hawk, Founder and CEO of IllumiNative.
More Stories Like This
Q&A: Sicangu Lakota Filmmaker Yvonne Russo on Her New Hulu Series, 'Vow of Silence: The Assassination of Annie Mae'Third Annual Tribal Museums Day Centers Diverse Histories, Cultures & Lifeways
Tommy Orange's "Wandering Stars" Makes TIME's 100 Must-Read Books of 2024 List
Barbie Honors Maria Tallchief, America’s First Prima Ballerina, with Inspiring Women Doll for Native American Heritage Month
10 Native American Artists and Musicians You Should Know
Support Independent Indigenous Journalism That Holds Power to Account
With the election now decided, Native News Online is recommitting to our core mission: rigorous oversight of federal Indian policy and its impact on tribal communities.
The previous Trump administration’s record on Indian Country — from the reduction of sacred sites to aggressive energy development on tribal lands — demands heightened vigilance as we enter this new term. Our Indigenous-centered newsroom will provide unflinching coverage of policies affecting tribal sovereignty, sacred site protection, MMIR issues, water rights, Indian health, and economic sovereignty.
This critical watchdog journalism requires resources. Your support, in any amount, helps maintain our independent, Native-serving news coverage. Every contribution helps keep our news free for all of our relatives. Please donate today to ensure Native News Online can thrive and deliver impactful, independent journalism.
