- Details
- By Elyse Wild
A statement from the Native American Rights Fund (NARF) says the city’s action is an attempt to intimidate the Tribe into withdrawing its request for documents that could shine light on any new Voting Rights Act violations that could prevent Native Americans from having an equal opportunity to participate in the political process and elect representatives of their choice.
The Tribe, represented by the NARF, ACLU of South Dakota, and Public Counsel, is appealing the City of Martin’s actions to the South Dakota Office of Hearing Examiners.
“The City of Martin’s attempt to block the Tribe from obtaining public documents about its redistricting process is alarming given the long history of voting violations against Native Americans in South Dakota. NARF will continue to join with Tribes to resist,” Samantha Kelty, NARF senior staff attorney, said in a statement.
“The Oglala Sioux Tribe understands it may have to pay a reasonable fee for the records it requested, but charging attorney fees is simply not reasonable,” OST President Frank Star Comes Out said in statement. “The City of Martin has no legal right to charge Native Americans a higher rate for copies of public records. The Tribe will not stand by while the city attempts to put up these illegal roadblocks. The Tribe demands the same transparency to which every other member of the public is entitled.”
Charging a reasonable fee for city staff time to fulfill a public records request is permissible. The City of Martin, however, did not calculate a potential fee and simply stated that the “request may cost many, many hours of both attorney and city employee time.”
Charging attorney fees is not allowed under South Dakota law. South Dakota law also does not require Tribes to waive sovereign immunity to obtain public records.
The Tribe first made a request on Aug. 25, 2023, for records relating to potential violations of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The records requested span 20 years and include election results, redistricting maps, agendas from meetings where redistricting was discussed, any and all analysis of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, and more.
The city denied the request on Sept. 11, 2023. A letter penned by the cit’s attorney’s, Gunderson, Palmer, Nelson & Ashmore, LLP, stated, “[i]f full payment is not received upfront,” the city requires the Tribe to “waive sovereign immunity to account for the possible non-payment of the requested materials. The Oglala Sioux Tribe must include the waiver in its written confirmation that it will pay the associated fee for gathering the twenty years of records.”
The letter also stated the hourly cost to acquire the requested materials could total nearly $500, between attorney’s fees and hourly wage for city employees.
“Imposing attorney fees on public records requests will act as a deterrent, rendering them financially inaccessible to the vast majority of the public,” Mustafa Filat, Justice Catalyst Fellow at Public Counsel’s Opportunity Under Law Project, said in a statement.
On Nov. 29, 2023, The Oglala Sioux Tribe objected to the city’s conditions outlined in the letter. On Dec. 9, 2023, the city issued a statement affirming its stance.
The Tribe has since reduced the request from 20 years of records to 10 years of records.
“In a democracy, people are entitled to information about the work the government is carrying out on their behalf. The Oglala Sioux Tribe is no different,” Stephanie Amiotte, ACLU of South Dakota legal director, said in a statement. “But the city’s conditions are unreasonable, not grounded in South Dakota law, and undermine the objective of governmental transparency at the heart of the public records request process. The city’s conditions also treat Tribes in South Dakota differently than other requesters who are making public records requests.”
“The requests are vague and broad, leaving it difficult for a layperson to determine whether a statutory exception applies,” Sara Frankenstein, an attorney representing the City of Martin, told The Rapid City Journal. “Many of the requests require legal analysis as to whether the documents sought are excluded from public disclosure pursuant to South Dakota law. Additionally, the request sought documents spanning over twenty years. Such a huge and broad request is taxing on the City of Martin’s resources and its citizenry. The City of Martin is small, and resources are thin.”
The city asked that the Tribe wave its sovereign immunity — which protects it from both private and commercial lawsuits, like any other nation — to ensure the request would be paid should it be fulfilled.
The Tribe is appealing to the South Dakota Office of Hearing Examiners, alleging the conditions sought by the City of Martin are unreasonable at best or were sought in bad faith at worst.
More Stories Like This
50 Years of Self-Determination: How a Landmark Act Empowered Tribal Sovereignty and Transformed Federal-Tribal RelationsMuscogee Nation and City of Tulsa Reach Agreement on Criminal Jurisdiction and Public Safety Collaboration
Panel on Ethical Tribal Engagement at OU Highlights Healing, Research and Sovereignty
Groundbreaking Held for Western Navajo Pipeline Phase I – LeChee Water System Improvement Project
Navajo Citizens Voice Mixed Reactions to Trump’s Coal Executive Order at Public Hearing
Help us tell the stories that could save Native languages and food traditions
At a critical moment for Indian Country, Native News Online is embarking on our most ambitious reporting project yet: "Cultivating Culture," a three-year investigation into two forces shaping Native community survival—food sovereignty and language revitalization.
The devastating impact of COVID-19 accelerated the loss of Native elders and with them, irreplaceable cultural knowledge. Yet across tribal communities, innovative leaders are fighting back, reclaiming traditional food systems and breathing new life into Native languages. These aren't just cultural preservation efforts—they're powerful pathways to community health, healing, and resilience.
Our dedicated reporting team will spend three years documenting these stories through on-the-ground reporting in 18 tribal communities, producing over 200 in-depth stories, 18 podcast episodes, and multimedia content that amplifies Indigenous voices. We'll show policymakers, funders, and allies how cultural restoration directly impacts physical and mental wellness while celebrating successful models of sovereignty and self-determination.
This isn't corporate media parachuting into Indian Country for a quick story. This is sustained, relationship-based journalism by Native reporters who understand these communities. It's "Warrior Journalism"—fearless reporting that serves the 5.5 million readers who depend on us for news that mainstream media often ignores.
We need your help right now. While we've secured partial funding, we're still $450,000 short of our three-year budget. Our immediate goal is $25,000 this month to keep this critical work moving forward—funding reporter salaries, travel to remote communities, photography, and the deep reporting these stories deserve.
Every dollar directly supports Indigenous journalists telling Indigenous stories. Whether it's $5 or $50, your contribution ensures these vital narratives of resilience, innovation, and hope don't disappear into silence.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Native languages are being lost at an alarming rate. Food insecurity plagues many tribal communities. But solutions are emerging, and these stories need to be told.
Support independent Native journalism. Fund the stories that matter.
Levi Rickert (Potawatomi), Editor & Publisher
