- Details
Many US states have had issues with tribal organizations in the gambling domain. There has been a lot of talk and dispute over who should have the autonomy on casinos and which groups would be allowed to partake and in what percentage.
Unfortunately, in most states, this continues to be an issue as no satisfying compromise has been made to this day. This is definitely not for the lack of trying. Many states have had numerous attempts to regulate this once and for all, but all propositions would end the same satisfying way. However, an interesting thing happened in Florida in April 2021. An official document was made named The Gaming Compact between the state of Florida and the Seminole tribe which gives the tribe exclusive rights to run gambling sites and casinos on its reservations.
The situation got complicated a bit when online sports wagering was introduced. Generally, online gambling is becoming more and more popular. Aside from sports betting, there are numerous online casinos offering the most amazing selection of games anyone could imagine. At first, many people were skeptical about using them because they were worried about their personal information going into the wrong hands, but after the rise of no KYC casinos, the popularity of online gaming grew. There are many online casinos offering anonymous accounts in 2024, which means the demand for this type of entertainment will only rise, and so will the profits.
But how does all that fit into the Gaming Compact? People would say that talking about online gambling in the sense of the territory where it happens is ambiguous, to say the least. If you gamble online, does it count as if you are gambling on the grounds of a particular state? On the other hand, is it not true that you are gambling online and that is the territory, the internet? It is the same wherever you use it, so perhaps it doesn’t make sense to talk about territory in this context. This question indeed caused a lot of dispute in Florida and gave cause for complaints when it comes to the Compact.
This is exactly one of the reasons two of the tribe’s fiercest gaming competitors complained to the US Supreme Court. They are hoping the court would be open to the option that the exclusive rights to online gambling for tribal organizations be revoked as only the servers are on tribal territory, while the gaming happens pretty much everywhere. However, since the situation is extremely unusual and open to different interpretations, it is difficult to give any predictions or have certain expectations.
The Seminole tribe counts about 5,000 Native Americans and they have a strong gaming presence, owning the Hard Rock Hotel & Casinos business which has facilities in 76 countries and operating 7 casinos in the state of Florida. Disney and Genting, the two competitors that complained, do have legs to stand on when it comes to this dispute. They claim that the Compact gives an unfair advantage to the Seminole tribe when it comes to some forms of gambling and that this should change. They may also feel there are some legal issues that contradict federal or state laws. There is no doubt that the two companies are making all this effort for their business interests. However, the outcome of this fight may potentially affect many companies in the US.
As already mentioned, the outcome of this dispute is very important for the future of online gaming in the United States. If the court decides to rule in favor of the Seminole tribe, it may mean that the prohibitions against gambling off tribal lands would get more severe in the rest of the US. On the contrary, if they accept the appeal, it will also have a great effect on both tribal and non-tribal organizations across the country.
Nevertheless, it seems that these two companies are very determined in their goals as they also sued the secretary of the US Department of Interior, which is in charge of tribal gambling, Deb Haaland. They claim that the compact gives the tribe a monopoly over the gambling industry sector and therefore, it tries to get around the Florida Constitution. Disney and Genting Group also sued DeSantis, the governor who signed the compact in 2021. DeSantis firmly claims that the compact is beneficial for all parties and, not only that it brings peace and compromise to all opposing sides, it also brings financial gains for everyone involved.