- Details
- By Native News Online Staff
On Thursday, the U.S. District Court in Alaska granted the Alaska Federation of Natives’ motion to intervene in the latest case challenging Alaska Natives fishing rights.
The first iteration of the case began almost four decades ago, when two Athabascan elders, Katie John and Doris Charles, petitioned the state to allow them to fish in their traditional fish camp that was closed in 1964. Their request was denied, despite the fact that downstream users were permitted to take salmon for sport and commercial uses.
As a result, the Native American Rights Fund (NARF) filed suit in 1985 under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), to compel the State to re-open the historic fishery.
Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act provides a priority for rural Alaska residents in the taking of fish and wildlife on federal public lands in times of shortage.
“The rural priority is a necessity, not a luxury. Those of us who live in rural Alaska continue to do so because of the direct proximity to fish and wildlife,” Alaska Federation Natives (AFN) Co-Chair Ana Hoffman said in a statement. “This federal protection for rural Alaskans, secured by Alaska Native leaders decades ago, is the source of our nourishment physically, emotionally, culturally, and spiritually. This is our way of life; it is our existence.”
The most recent subsistence challenge came in 2021 in U.S. v. Alaska, when the State of Alaska refused to abide by federal closures regarding salmon fishing along certain parts of the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta based on low escapement numbers, according to NARF. USFWS had simultaneously permitted qualified federal subsistence users (rural Alaska residents) to participate in limited openings.”
AFN said it expects that U.S. v. Alaska will eventually make its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.
‘This is a welcomed ruling,’ AFN President Julie Kitka said in a statement in response to the U.S. District Court in Alaska’s decision. “AFN has a special place in this litigation… We’ll defend the legal rights of Alaska Natives to engage in subsistence hunting and fishing anytime our ways of life are threatened.”
More Stories Like This
Waadookodaading Ojibwe Language Institute Receives $1.5 Million Gift from MacKenzie Scott to Advance Language Revitalization Efforts'This is all we have.' | Tribal Citizens Continue Protest of Wind River Land Grab
Osage Minerals Council Secures Landmark Legal Victory Over Enel for Trespass in Osage Mineral Estate
David Sickey Writes About the Historic Opportunity for Tribes to Secure Their Water Rights
Keepers of the Flame Storytellers Charged with Sustaining Chickasaw Essence
Can we take a minute to talk about tribal sovereignty?
Sovereignty isn't just a concept – it's the foundation of Native nations' right to govern, protect our lands, and preserve our cultures. Every story we publish strengthens tribal sovereignty.
Unlike mainstream media, we center Indigenous voices and report directly from Native communities. When we cover land rights, water protection, or tribal governance, we're not just sharing news – we're documenting our living history and defending our future.
Our journalism is powered by readers, not shareholders. If you believe in the importance of Native-led media in protecting tribal sovereignty, consider supporting our work today.
Right now, your support goes twice as far. Thanks to a generous $35,000 matching fund, every dollar you give during December 2024 will be doubled to protect sovereignty and amplify Native voices.
No paywalls. No corporate owners. Just independent, Indigenous journalism.
