data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8864/a8864734bc7e45aeaa87c3ef957ca3727a22f330" alt="Effigy Mounds National Monument in Iowa/ (photo/public domain)"
- Details
- By Kaili Berg
Recent layoffs within the National Park Service (NPS) and the U.S. Forest Service could significantly affect national parks across the country, many of which hold deep cultural and historical significance to Native American tribes.
The federal government, under the Trump administration, has announced cuts affecting approximately 3,400 employees from the U.S. Forest Service, around 10% of its workforce, and about 1,000 employees from the NPS, reducing staff by roughly 5%.
Most of those affected are probationary employees with less than a year of service, while critical positions such as firefighters and law enforcement officers are exempt. However, the broader consequences of these layoffs are already being felt in various parks, particularly those that require consistent upkeep, public education, and preservation efforts.
Effigy Mounds National Monument in Iowa is among the sites facing direct effects from layoffs. Known for its preservation of over 200 prehistoric Native American burial and ceremonial mounds, the site has been a critical location for archaeological study and historical interpretation.
Recently, two NPS employees at Effigy Mounds were laid off, including environmental educator Brian Gibbs, who played a key role in increasing public awareness of the site’s historical importance. The reduction in staff has raised concerns about the monument’s capacity to maintain its educational outreach and protect these culturally significant sites.
The layoffs will also impact operations at several major national parks and landmarks, including the Appalachian Trail, the birthplace of Martin Luther King Jr., Sequoia National Forest, and Yosemite National Park.
Yellowstone National Park, one of the most visited and historically significant parks in the country, is also experiencing staffing reductions. As the first national park in the United States, Yellowstone requires a well-maintained workforce to support its ecosystem, including geothermal features, wildlife, and historical sites.
The cuts would impact the park’s ability to provide ranger-led programs, enforce conservation efforts, and maintain trails and facilities at peak operation levels.
With fewer park rangers and educators, there is growing concern about the cultural sites and the potential loss of interpretive programs that educate visitors on the cultural significance and history of these lands.
The National Parks Conservation Association has issued a warning about the consequences of these staffing reductions.
“Visitors from around the world come to our national parks expecting a once-in-a-lifetime experience, but instead could be met with overflowing trash, uncleaned bathrooms and fewer rangers to provide guidance,” Kristen Brengel, NPCA’s Senior Vice President of Government Affairs, said in a statement. “These are not the memories we want people to take away from their experience at our parks.”
In Wrangell, Alaska, local tribal leaders have voiced concerns over the layoff’s impact on collaborative efforts with the Forest Service.
“They’re an amazing partner to us as the tribe,” Tribal Administrator Esther Aalséen Reese said in an interview with KSTK. “They’re an integral part of the fabric of our community and we’re losing people that we work with on a day-to-day basis. Literally, the Wrangell community is going to suffer by losing these wonderful individuals.”
In response, community members gathered to show solidarity with affected workers, emphasizing the broader consequences these cuts could have on Wrangell’s economy and cultural preservation efforts.
With fewer resources available, park officials will have to make difficult decisions about which services to prioritize, potentially leading to fewer educational programs, reduced access to certain areas, and slower response times on maintenance and emergency services.
More Stories Like This
'Misguided': Alaska Native Orgs, Senator Lisa Murkowski Decry Trump’s Denali MoveTohono O’odham Nation signs co-stewardship with BLM over sacred lands
Reaction to Trump's "Putting People Over Fish" Executive Order
Court of Appeals hears arguments against Line 5 tunnel project
Can we take a minute to talk about tribal sovereignty?
Our mission draws from the warrior spirit that has sustained Indigenous peoples for generations — the same spirit that drives us to stand guard over tribal rights through relentless investigation and fearless reporting.
Sovereignty isn't just a concept – it's the foundation of Native nations' right to govern, protect our lands, and preserve our cultures. Every story we publish strengthens tribal sovereignty.
Unlike mainstream media, we center Indigenous voices and report directly from Native communities. When we cover land rights, water protection, or tribal governance, we're not just sharing news – we're documenting our living history and defending our future.
Our journalism is powered by readers, not shareholders. If you believe in the importance of Native-led media in protecting tribal sovereignty, consider supporting our work today.