The decade-long fight by the Apache Stronghold, a nonprofit organization composed of the some tribal citizens of San Carlos Tribe and other Native Americans,sustained a severe blow on Friday when the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a close 6-5 ruled in favor of Rio and BHP for the Resolution Copper project.ย
The project will allow for the destruction of Oak Flat, in Apache known as Chiโchil Biลdagoteel, that has been a gathering space for sacred ceremonies for time immemorial for the Apache and other Native American tribes.
Apache Stronghold leader Wendsler Nosie vowed to appeal the Fridayโs decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.ย
“Oak Flat is like Mount Sinai to us โ our most sacred site, where we connect with our Creator, our faith, our families and our land,” Nosie said. “Today’s ruling targets the spiritual lifeblood of my people, but it will not stop our struggle to save Oak Flat.”
The land deal between the U.S Forest Service and corporation in a last-minute provision was inserted into a 2014 must-pass defense bill authorizing the transfer of Oak Flat to Resolution Copper, a foreign-owned mining company that plans to turn the sacred site into a two-mile-wide and 1,100-foot-deep crater.ย
“This ruling is illogical and it’s unjust,” said Luke Goodrich, a Becket Law attorney who represents Apache Stronghold. The group intends to appeal to the Supreme Court and feels it has a strong case given how closely divided the appeals court was, Goodrich added.
On Sunday, the San Carlos Apache Tribe issued a press release saying โwhile the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling Friday, March 1, 2024 against the non-profit citizens group Apache Stronghold is extremely disappointing, the ruling does not clear the way for construction of the Resolution Copper Mine.โ
โThe culturally and environmentally devastating Resolution project is no closer to construction today than it was before the appeals court ruling,โ San Carlos Apache Tribe Chairman Terry Rambler continued in the press release. โThe Tribe will continue to fight construction of the project that would have devastating impacts to the Tribeโs culture, the environment and Arizonaโs drinking water supplies.โย
The Trump Administration pushed through Resolutionโs deeply flawed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in the last week of Trumpโs presidency.
The Biden Administration subsequently withdrew the EIS because it failed to address the irreparable harm this mine would inflict on the environment and Apache culture.ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย ย
โThe Biden Administration correctly withdrew the deeply flawed report and should never reissue the environmental study,โ Chairman Rambler said. โThe Tribe appreciates President Bidenโs leadership in ensuring the federal government honors its solemn commitments to tribes, including the protection of sacred areas on federal land.โ
There are also two outstanding federal lawsuits โ including one filed by the San Carlos Apache Tribe โ that have yet to be litigated. These suits raise multiple critical arguments on why this mine should not be allowed to move forward.
The United States already exports one-third of the copper produced in its mines because there is not enough smelter capacity to process the countryโs raw copper into finished metal. Resolution has stated it does not intend to build a new smelter. China operates nine of the 20 largest copper smelters in the world and is the worldโs largest importer of raw copper concentrate.
โAll the evidence points to the fact that Rio Tinto and BHP will export Resolutionโs copper overseas to China. This is a national security threat that will bolster Chinaโs economy at the expense of all Americans.โ Chairman Rambler stated. โThe Resolution Mine is clearly not in the best interest of the Tribe, the citizens of Arizona, and American taxpayers and must be stopped.โ
